Autumn Skywatching Treat: See Uranus and Neptune in the Night Sky

Autumn Skywatching Treat: See Uranus and Neptune in the Night Sky

Partner Series
Autumn Skywatching Treat: See Uranus and Neptune in the Night Sky
Uranus and Neptune will be in excellent positions to spot them in the night sky this autumn.

Credit: Starry Night

Midautumn places the two outermost planets in excellent position for viewing.

We often speak of the five “naked-eye” planets (Mercury, Venus, Mars, Jupiter and Saturn), but in actuality, there is a sixth that can be glimpsed with the unaided eye if you know precisely where to look — and another that can be seen when you use a good pair of binoculars. Uranus can also be seen by a sharp-eyed observer who knows where to look for it; Neptune is the only planet that requires optical aid in order to be seen.

Both planets were discovered after the invention of the telescope. Uranus was discovered more or less by accident in 1781. Uranus’ failure to follow its predicted orbit seemed to be due to the gravitational pull of a planet farther out in space. Two astronomers independently calculated the position of the undiscovered planet, and when telescopes were turned to this region in 1846, Neptune was found. [Stargazing Maps: Best Night Sky Events of October 2017]

So, while our evening sky will soon be devoid of bright planets (Saturn will depart the scene by early December), Uranus and Neptune will be in excellent positions to be seen.

Of course, the trick is that you’ll have to know exactly where to look!

Uranus, the green planet

Barely visible to the unaided eye on very dark, clear nights, the planet Uranus — currently shining at magnitude 5.7 — is now visible during the evening hours among the stars of the constellation Pisces, the fishes. Pisces is shaped like two fishing lines tied together in a knot, with one fish dangling from each line; it resembles the shape of the letter V, tilted on its side. The star that marks the knot is known as Al Risha, a fourth-magnitude star. Above Al Risha is a star of similar brightness, known as Omicron Piscium.

The next step is to carefully study a star chart, then scan that region with binoculars. Uranus should be evident, set off by its greenish tint. Uranus just passed its opposition to the sun (on Oct. 19) and is currently visible in the sky all through the night. Right now, it appears at its highest at around midnight local daylight time, when it will stand roughly 60 degrees above the southern horizon; roughly two-thirds up from the horizon to the point directly overhead (the zenith).

Using a magnification of 150x with a telescope of at least three-inch aperture, you just might be able to resolve Uranus into a tiny, pale-green, featureless disk. While observing Uranus from the Susan F. Rose Observatory at the Custer Institute in Southold on Oct. 21, New York amateur astronomer Bart Fried wrote to New York’s Amateur Observers’ Society (NYAOS): “[At] 180-power for Uranus … that’s a speck!” Unless the seeing, or blurring and twinkling caused by Earth’s atmosphere is “total chaos,” Fried suggested trying a 300x telescope, “and next time, it will actually look like a planet. And maybe with [a larger aperture], some mottling or cloud feature will be visible.”

Indeed, larger instruments will better resolve this planet’s verdant disk.

Uranus Quiz: How Well Do You Know the Tilted Planet? Neptune Quiz: How Well Do You Know the Other Blue Planet?
The butt of solar system jokes, Uranus is also a spectacular blue planet still hiding many scientific secrets. See how much you know:
Uranus Rings Tilted
0 of 10 questions complete

Uranus currently is 1.85 billion miles (2.97 billion kilometers) from the sun and 1.76 billion miles (2.83 billion km) from Earth. It has a diameter of 31,518 miles (50,712 km), and according to flyby magnetic data from Voyager 2 in January 1986, it has a rotation period of 17.4 hours.

At last count, Uranus has 27 moons. They are all in orbits that lie in the planet’s equator, in which there is also a complex of nine narrow, nearly opaque rings, which were discovered in 1978. Uranus likely has a rocky core surrounded by a liquid mantle of water, methane and ammonia, encased in an atmosphere of hydrogen and helium.

A bizarre feature is how far over Uranus is tipped. Its north pole lies 98 degrees from being directly up and down to its orbit plane. Thus, its seasons are extreme: When the sun rises at its north pole, it stays up for 42 Earth years; then it sets, and the North Pole is in darkness for 42 Earth years.

Neptune, the blue planet

Neptune, on the other hand, is much too faint to be perceived with the unaided eye. With Pluto’s demotion to dwarf planet status in 2006, Neptune is now recognized as the most distant planet in the solar system. Currently, it lies at a distance of 2.78 billion miles (4.48 billion km) from the sun and 2.73 billion miles (4.39 billion km) from Earth.

It is slightly smaller than Uranus, with a diameter of 30,598 miles (49,232 km). Currently at magnitude 7.8, it’s more than six times dimmer than Uranus. At this moment in time, Neptune can be found in the constellation of Aquarius, the Water Carrier.

You might try using the 3.7-magnitude star Lambda Aquarii to steer you toward Neptune. Currently, Neptune is only about a half-degree (about a full moon’s width) to the south of this star. Neptune should be recognizable, thanks to its bluish color. If you have access to a dark, clear sky and carefully examine a star chart of this region, you should have no trouble in finding it with a good pair of binoculars.

From Long Beach, New York, amateur astronomer Larry Gerstman wrote to NYAOS: “For the last couple of months I have been following the motion of the planet Neptune in several of my binoculars. Its motion is like watching that of an asteroid, and much of the apparent motion is really more about the motion of the Earth. I have been using mostly my 20×60 Bushnell binoculars, which I just took out of my closet after many years of non-use since I have larger pairs, but I’m rediscovering how great they are — especially with their wide apparent field of 70-degrees (which is an actual field of 3.5-degrees at 20x) and crisp sharpness in a compact size.”

Neptune is currently at its highest point in the sky at around 9 p.m. local daylight time, climbing about 40 degrees above the southern horizon; nearly halfway from the horizon to the zenith. [How to Measure Distances in the Night Sky]

With a telescope, trying to resolve Neptune into a disk will be more difficult for observers to do than it will be with Uranus. You’re going to need at least an 8-inch telescope with a magnification of no less than 200x, just to turn Neptune into a tiny blue dot of light.

Uranus Quiz: How Well Do You Know the Tilted Planet? Neptune Quiz: How Well Do You Know the Other Blue Planet?
Neptune is the most distant full-fledged planet in the solar system (though some Pluto fans would beg to differ). Test your knowledge of this strange and frigid world.
Comet Smacked Neptune 200 Years Ago, Data Suggests
0 of 10 questions complete

One of Neptune’s 14 moons, Triton, has a tenuous atmosphere of nitrogen, and at 1,680 miles (2,703 km) in diameter, it’s larger than Pluto. Because it is moving in a retrograde (backward) orbit, there has been some suggestion that Neptune’s strong gravitational pull may actually have captured it in the distant past. Those who have access to a large telescope of 12 inches or more might even be able to get a glimpse of Triton, very close to Neptune itself.

Voyager 2 passed Neptune in August 1989 and relayed its possession of a deep-blue atmosphere, with rapidly moving wisps of white clouds. Also evident was a Great Dark Spot, rather similar in nature to Jupiter’s famous Great Red Spot. Observations of Neptune using the Hubble Space Telescope suggest that the dark spot seen by Voyager 2 has dissipated; yet it has apparently been replaced by another. The atmosphere of Neptune is apparently chiefly composed of hydrocarbon compounds. Based on the rotation rate of its magnetic field, a rotation rate of 16.1 hours has been assigned to Neptune. Voyager 2 also revealed the existence of at least three rings around Neptune, composed of very fine particles.

Editor’s note: If you take an amazing photo of Uranus or Neptune that you’d like to share with Space.com and our news partners for a possible story or image gallery, please contact managing editor Tariq Malik at spacephotos@space.com.

Joe Rao serves as an instructor and guest lecturer at New York’s Hayden Planetarium. He writes about astronomy for Natural History magazine, the Farmers’ Almanac and other publications, and he is also an on-camera meteorologist for Fios1 News in Rye Brook, NY. Follow us @SpacedotcomFacebook and Google+. Original article on Space.com.

Ask an Astronaut’: Q & A with British Spacewalker Tim Peake

Ask an Astronaut’: Q & A with British Spacewalker Tim Peake

Partner Series

Ask an Astronaut': Q & A with British Spacewalker Tim Peake

British astronaut Tim Peake was the first to wear the union flag on a spacewalk when he ventured outside the space station in January 2015.

Credit: NASA

Tim Peake was the first British European Space Agency astronaut to visit the International Space Station, and might also be the first to call the wrong number on Christmas in space.

When he returned to Earth, he was overwhelmed with questions at his public appearances — what it’s like on board the space station, training to be an astronaut, how it felt to return. So Peake put out a call for even more questions, and spun them all into “Ask an Astronaut” (Little, Brown and Co., 2017), a new book about life in space.

Space.com talked with Peake about the new book, his ultimate space mission and what it’s like to hang from a beam mid-spacewalk, Australia orbiting below you. [‘Hello, Is This Planet Earth?’ Astronaut Tim Peake’s New Book Features Stunning Photos]

Space.com: What questions did you most enjoy answering for “Ask an Astronaut”?

Peake: The chapter that I enjoyed writing the most was the spacewalk chapter. For me, the spacewalk was such an exhilarating and exciting experience, and quite an amazing thing to be outside the space station, to be working out in the vacuum of space for so long. So I thoroughly enjoyed writing and asking all of those questions. And I love trying to explain to people, as well, what it’s like to be there, the view of Planet Earth looking down from outside the space station. The whole spacewalking chapter was by far the best.

Space.com: What was the most surprising aspect of taking a spacewalk?

Peake: You’re trained in so much detail for everything you’re going to do, but nobody can actually, really say what it’s like outside the space station. I was pleasantly surprised once the airlock opened, and we got to work outside, how relaxed I was, how easy it was to work outside. But there was one moment — I had been out for probably over about an hour and a half to two hours, and I was returning to the edge of the space station with a failed component that we’d replaced. I was taking a shortcut down a small metal pole that takes you to the airlock, because I had to put this failed unit back in the airlock, and halfway across I looked down, and I was very exposed — it was as if I was hanging underneath this pole. I looked down and Australia was passing beneath me, and I had this massive rush of vertigo which really took me by surprise. I’d been out there for so long, and I hadn’t felt like that at all. I wasn’t expecting it. It actually made me smile, made me laugh, to have that feeling. NASA astronaut Chris Cassidy has told me if that happens, to wiggle your toes in your boots. By wiggling your toes, it will make your fingers slack. And they did, it worked very well, and so I carried on. [Watch British Astronaut Tim Peake Perform Dizzying Somersaults in Space]

Space.com: What’s the hardest thing to describe about space?

Peake: The hardest thing to describe is the feeling of looking back on Planet Earth. It’s very difficult to put into words what it’s like being in space. It’s a mixture of the physical feeling of being weightless and being detached, and … the emotional feeling of what you’re observing, as well, of Planet Earth. And when you put those two things together, it’s really quite an overwhelming sensation. If you imagine being outside of the space station, inside a spacesuit, you don’t feel any part of that space on you. There’s no pressure, there’s no gravity, there’s no weight on your body. When you’re completely relaxed, and just floating, you feel so remarkably detached because there’s almost no force on your body.

And then at the same time, you’re looking down on Planet Earth passing beneath you, and then you turn the other way and you’re looking up at the solar system and the universe and the vast expanse. And you put those two things together, the physical feeling and the emotional, and it’s just a really overwhelming sensation. It’s a complete change of perspective. And that’s very hard to describe to people, exactly what that feels like.

Space.com: You also tried to convey that feeling in your photo book, out earlier this year. Can you talk about how writing this book was different?

Peake: With the photobook, that became a real driving passion of mine and a hobby whilst I was up in space. And also, during the mission as well, I was amazed at the response I was getting on social media when I was posting these photos. I felt I had a responsibility to try and share the mission as much as possible; to share the views that I was seeing. That really drove me, in the early stages, that’s why I picked up the camera and started taking photos. At the beginning, it felt like a little bit of a chore, to be picking up the camera and taking photos, but when I started to see the response, and I started to see my own skills improving, my photography improving, it just became an absolute passion. I loved it.

If I got the opportunity to go into space again I know the first thing I would do would be to go to the window, take out the camera and take a photo. “Hello, Is It Planet Earth?” was really wanting to immediately share those images of Earth and space. And that is something I could do really quickly.

“Ask an Astronaut” has taken 6 months to write, and I’ve really put my heart and soul in it, and really try to go into much more detail about what living in space is like. What is it really like to be an astronaut on those long-duration missions, watching your body change, going through the training for the mission, coming back and the return to Earth, and answering all those amazing questions that people ask.

Space.com: If you headed to space again, what would be your ideal mission?

Peake: If I had my absolute wish of a second mission, it would be a mission that I think is probably coming up within the next 10 years, and that’s the return to the lunar surface. NASA in conjunction with the European Space Agency and other partners are building the Deep Space Gateway, which is going to be a new space station in cislunar orbit, and that gives the opportunity to have missions back to the lunar surface, and also it’s paving the way for the medium-term goal of getting to Mars.

Space.com: What do you expect to see changing in spaceflight in the coming years?

Peake: It’s going to be a really exciting and interesting environment. We’re already preparing for this, and … we’re looking at how [the International Space Station] is going to hand over to the commercial space sector. We’ve already got a Bigelow module attached to the International Space Station, and there are plans for a company called Axiom to put two modules onto the space station, and eventually, when the International Space Station deorbits and burns up, one, potentially two commercial space stations will be remaining. [Astronauts Enter Inflatable Space Station Module for 1st Time (Video)]

We’re going to start to see that transition, that handover if you like, to commercial transport to low-Earth orbit. I think that will really energize a new, emerging market for microgravity research in low-Earth orbit. That’s going to be fascinating to watch, as more and more of these companies realize the benefits of microgravity research. And at the same time, we’re going to be watching the national space agencies partner on these exciting missions to the moon, and for preparations to going to Mars. And also space tourism — I know that Virgin Galactic, XCOR, Sierra Nevada, they will be working away on these space tourist missions, which are all going to start happening in the next five years or so. There’s an awful lot that’s going to be happening; it’s going to be a very exciting time.

Space.com: If you can comment, which commercial spacecraft would you most like to ride on?

Peake: No, I’m not going to give you an answer on that one — but what I will say is that firstly, the Soyuz was just such an incredibly wonderful experience. It’s steeped in so much history and tradition, and it’s solid Russian engineering with this brilliant hybrid of old and new. It was an absolute pleasure to fly on the Soyuz spacecraft. From a test pilot perspective, and coming from a military test pilot background, the idea of flying on either Boeing or SpaceX’s vehicle as a new spacecraft is very exciting … either Boeing or SpaceX would be a brilliant spacecraft to fly.

Space.com: How does your test pilot background fit in with going to space?

Peake: From a test pilot perspective, I felt that I did have a huge advantage, not just in areas with direct skill transfer like the robotic arm, which is very similar to flying a helicopter, [and] communications skills, for example, which we focus a lot on during test pilot training, but also the whole space station is a cutting-edge laboratory, and every day a lot of the pieces of equipment you’re touching, a lot of the experiments you’re touching, people are asking questions back on Earth. There’re experiments that people are saying well, how is it going to work in microgravity. Just having that test pilot mindset of knowing how to conduct an evaluation, how to conduct an experiment and how to report the results clearly and concisely so that people understand how we can make things better … you’re evaluating new pieces of equipment every single day.

Space.com: I was struck by the huge amount of support you got on social media from people following your mission. Can you talk about that?

Peake: It was a huge surprise to me as well. For astronauts on board the space station, it’s wonderful to get that feedback, because it actually helps you connect back with Planet Earth. After a few months in space, you do miss your friends, you miss your family, you miss the company of other people. To actually be able to reach out to so many people on social media and share your mission, but also receive the warm feedback and the positive feedback that was coming was very important both ways — to share the mission with other people, but for me as well it was a source of connection with Planet Earth, which was wonderful.

It’s still quite surprising how isolated you are [in space]. On the space station we have limited email, we have very limited internet access, painfully slow; the only information we have sent up to us is that that’s sent up by our ground control teams, our crew support teams.

[For instance, a surprising social media moment was after] the spacewalk, although, for me, that was an absolute pivotal moment of my career, and a life-changing experience. I got back in after the spacewalk, and Tim Kopra and myself were just chatting and having a cup of tea and drying out the spacesuits and cleaning up. I went back into my crew quarter and it really hit me when I started seeing some emails, people telling me you’ve had an email from Elton John saying enjoy your stroll outside. I mean, wow! Okay. It really hit me that it wasn’t just my own personal lifelong ambition come true, but it also had a huge impact on so many other people back on Earth.

This interview was edited for length. You can buy “Ask an Astronaut” on Amazon.com.

Email Sarah Lewin at slewin@space.com or follow her @SarahExplains. Follow us @SpacedotcomFacebook and Google+. Original article on Space.com

 

Sputnik 1! 7 Fun Facts About Humanity’s First Satellite

Sputnik 1! 7 Fun Facts About Humanity’s First Satellite
By Mike Wall, Space.com Senior Writer | October 2, 2017 06:20pm ET

 

Sputnik 1 was the size of a beach ball

Sputnik 1 weighed 184 lbs. (83 kilograms) and was 23 inches (58 centimeters) wide. (This measure refers to the satellite’s body; Sputnik 1 also featured two double-barreled antennas, the larger of which was 12.8 feet, or 3.9 meters, long.)

So, the satellite was quite small compared to the spacecraft of today, such as NASA’s Cassini Saturn orbiter, which was about the size of a school bus. But lofting something as heavy as Sputnik 1 was quite a feat in October 1957. Two months later, the United States tried to launch its first satellite — the 3.5-lb. (1.6 kg) Vanguard Test Vehicle 3 (TV3) — and failed.

The Soviet Union had been aiming bigger

Soviet space officials had wanted the nation’s first satellite to be much bigger than a beach ball. The original plan called for lofting a nearly 3,000-lb. (1,400 kg) craft outfitted with a variety of scientific instruments.

But development of this satellite, code-named “Object D,” progressed more slowly than expected, and Soviet officials grew increasingly worried that the United States might beat them to space. So, they decided to precede the launch of Object D with a “simplest satellite,” or “prosteishy sputnik” in Russian. Indeed, Sputnik 1 was also known as PS-1, Anatoly Zak noted at RussianSpaceWeb.com. (The literal translation of “sputnik,” by the way, is “traveling companion.”)

Sputnik 1 carried no scientific instruments. However, researchers did learn some things about Earth’s atmosphere by studying the beep-beep-beep radio signals emitted by the satellite.

The hulking Object D reached orbit as Sputnik 3 in May 1958, six months after Sputnik 2, which famously lofted a dog named Laika.

Sputnik 1 came perilously close to suffering the same fate as the United States’ TV3 satellite, which was destroyed in a launch failure on Dec. 6, 1957.

Sputnik 1 was lofted by an R-7 rocket, which consisted of four first-stage boosters — known as Blocks B, V, G and D — strapped onto a core second stage (Block A). During the launch, the Block G booster’s main engine reached its intended thrust levels later than expected.

“As a result, 6.5 seconds after the launch, the rocket started to pitch, deviating around 1 degree from the nominal trajectory 8 seconds after the liftoff,” Zak wrote. “In the effort to correct the increasing pitch angle, steering engines No. 2 and [No.] 4 on the core stage rotated as much as 8 degrees; similar engines on strap-on boosters of Block V and D rotated as much as 17-18 degrees, while tail air rudders rotated 10 degrees.

“Only a split second remained, after which the flight control system would terminate the flight of the underpowered rocket,” he added. “Fortunately, the engine finally reached normal performance, and [the] rocket fully returned to nominal trajectory some 18-20 seconds after the liftoff.”

Sputnik 1 eventually settled into an elliptical orbit, which took the satellite as close to Earth’s surface as 142 miles (228 kilometers) and as far away as 588 miles (947 km). The satellite zipped around Earth every 96 minutes.

Its mission was brief

Sputnik 1 was powered by three silver-zinc batteries, which were designed to operate for two weeks. The batteries exceeded expectations, as the satellite continued sending out its radio signal for 22 days.

The spacecraft continued lapping Earth in silence for a few more months, its orbit decaying and sending the craft steadily closer to the planet. The satellite finally burned up in the atmosphere on Jan. 4, 1958.

Photo Credit: Robert W. Kelley/The LIFE Picture Collection/Getty

Most Sputnik spotters actually saw its rocket

Though Sputnik 1 was small, it was quite reflective and therefore visible from Earth through a pair of binoculars (and perhaps even with the naked eye, if you had good vision and knew exactly where to look).

Many people reported seeing the satellite overhead in late 1957, but experts think most of these sightings actually involved the R-7. The rocket’s 85-foot-long (26 m) core stage also reached orbit, and it was covered with reflective panels to make tracking it easier. This rocket body fell back to Earth on Dec. 2, 1957, according to Zak.

Sputnik 1 led to the creation of NASA and DARPA

The launch of Sputnik 1 famously shook the United States.

“As a technical achievement, Sputnik caught the world’s attention and the American public off guard,” NASA historians wrote in 2007, in a piece marking the milestone’s 50-year anniversary. “Its size was more impressive than Vanguard’s intended 3.5-lb. payload. In addition, the public feared that the Soviets’ ability to launch satellites also translated into the capability to launch ballistic missiles that could carry nuclear weapons from Europe to the U.S.”

Such worries didn’t dissipate after the U.S. launched its first successful satellite, Explorer 1, on Jan. 31, 1958. American officials took several measures to boost the nation’s technological capabilities. These included creating the Advanced Research Projects Agency (later renamed the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency, or DARPA) in February 1958 and NASA in October of that year. (NASA’s precursor organization, the National Advisory Committee for Aeronautics, had been around since 1915.)

The satellite inspired the world ‘beatnik’

Sputnik 1’s huge cultural impact can be seen in the spate of “nik” neologisms its launch spurred, a few of which remain in use today. “Peacenik” is one well-known example, but the most famous is undoubtedly “beatnik,” which San Francisco newspaper columnist Herb Caen coined in 1958. (And beatnik, in turn, sparked another coinage — “neatnik.”)

Though Sputnik 1 raised “nik” to prominence in the U.S., the launch didn’t actually introduce the suffix — which is roughly equivalent to “er” in English — into the American lexicon; select Russian and Yiddish words had already done that. The term “no-goodnik,” for example, has been around since at least 1936, according to Merriam-Webster.com.

Follow Mike Wall on Twitter @michaeldwall and Google+. Follow us @SpacedotcomFacebook or Google+.